Abstract. Soil samples were collected from 6 abandoned minelands. All were extremely acidic with pH values ranging from 2.79 to 4.51. On each soil, nine lime requirement tests were performed. The tests included the Ca(OH)2 titration, Woodruff buffer, Mehlich buffer, the Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt double buffer, KC1 exchangeable acidity, acid-base account (total-S), acid-base account (reduced-S), hydrogen peroxide oxidation, and soxhlet extractions. The soils were then incubated in the greenhouse, each with different application rates of a highly reactive limestone. There were five liming rates per soil with each replicated four times. The moisture content was kept at approximately 33 kPa for six weeks followed by two weeks in which water was not added. This cycle continued for 15 months. At the end of six months and twelve months each treatment was leached with 2L of distilled water. The leachate was analyzed for pH. For this paper, only the six month leachate data was available. Incubation-leaching lime requirement values were based on the near maximum reactivity of the limestone. Laboratory values were related to the incubation values through correlation and regression analysis. The Ca(OH)2 test showed the strongest correlation with the incubation value (r=.95). The soil property most closely correlated with the incubation value was total-S (r=.85).
Additional key words: Acid-base account, buffer, exchangeable aluminum and pyrite.
![]()
1 Paper presented at the 1990 Mining and Reclamation Conference and Exhibition, Charleston, West Virginia, April 23-26, 1990.
2 P. J. Cagnetta is a Graduate Teaching Assistant, Division of Plant and Soil Sciences and E. M. Jencks is an Assoc. Professor of Agronomy, Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505.
![]()
There are many existing methods which are used to determine the lime requirement (LR) of agricultural soils (Dunn 1943 and Kamprath 1970). Several of the quick-test methods incorporate the use of a buffer solution adjusted to a known pH (Woodruff 1948; Mehlich 1976; McLean et al. 1978). These tests, with varying degrees of accuracy, account for the active and reserve acidity that results from hydrogen and the hydrolysis reactions of aluminum and its polymers.
Most buffer methods are based on the principle that when a buffer solution of a known pH is mixed with an acid soil the pH will decrease linearily with respect to the H content of the soil.
The Woodruff (1948) buffer method incorporates the use of a highly buffered solution that has been shown to be accurate on soils with differing exchange capacities and high lime requirements. The Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (1961) (SMP) method is ideally suited for soils with significant amounts of exchangeable Al and little organic matter. The SMP double buffer (McLean et al. 1978) (SMPDB) takes into account the buffering capacity of individual soils. For sandy soils the Yuan (1974) method is often employed while Adams and Evans (1962) devised a buffer for Red-Yellow Podzolic Ultisols.
Numerous comparison studies have been conducted on various types of soils. Alabi et al. (1986) evaluated eight buffer methods on coarse-textured soils of Nebraska. Kenney and Corey (1963) conducted an investigation on 26 Wisconsin soils. Trans and van Lierop (1981) determined the accuracy of buffer methods on Canadian soils. Lateritic soils of India were utilized in a study by Savant and Kibe (1971). When these methods were applied to acidic minesoils Mays and Bengston (1978) have indicated that these methods varied substantially in their prediction of lime requirements. Crews and Vogel (1986) found that the Woodruff and SMP methods underestimate the LR of minesoils containing pyrite.
Often with minesoils there is the added component of acidity generated from the oxidation of pyrite, FeS2, which yields sulfuric acid (Carruccio 1968 and Smith et al. 1970). The potential acidity from the unoxidized pyrite in the soil fraction must be considered in the total acidity when formulating an LR for these soils.
The acid-base account (Smith 1974) has been a widely accepted method for determining the LR of pyritic materials. The estimation of total S by hydrogen peroxide has also been employed, although it is more suited for fresh overburden material (Sobek et al. 1978).
The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the relationship of LR values predicted by nine methods with those by an incubation-leaching technique based on the maximum reactivity of the limestone, (2) determine the extent of correlation between LR values, and (3) determine the correlation of all LR values with various soil chemical properties. This is a preliminary report based on the first set of leachate data collected from an ongoing study.

Samples from six strongly acidic minesoils were collected from abandoned strip mine sites in Monongahela and Preston counties of north central West Virginia. Four sites were completely void of vegetation while the remaining two had little invading vegetation. Samples were collected to a depth of 15 cm. All soils were air-dried at approximately 28 C in the greenhouse and then were passed through a 2 mm sieve. Only the less than 2 mm size fraction was used in the study.
Soil pH was determined with a glass electrode pH meter using a 1:1 soil:water ratio. Organic carbon was determined according to the Walkley-Black method (Allison 1965), cation exchange capacity and exchangeable bases by the NH40Ac (pH 7) method, and exchangeable acidity and Al by KC1 extraction as outlined by the Soil Survey Staff (1984). Moisture retention at 33 kPa of pressure was determined using pressure plates and the pipette method was employed to determine particle size distribution. A Leco induction furnace with an automatic titrater was used to determine percent total - S. Sulfate-S was leached from the samples (Smith et al. 1978) and the percent reduced-S was determined again using the induction furnace. Soil characterization results can be found in Table 1.
The Ca(OH)2 titration (Dunn 1943) in conjunction with a five-minute boiling step, (Abruna and Vincente 1955) was used to determine the lime requirements of all soils. Exchangeable acidity was also used as a basis for liming. Buffer pH methods employed included the Woodruff (1948), the Mehlich (1976), and the Shoemaker, McLean and Pratt double-buffer (1978). The acid-base account utilizing both total and reduced-S also served to develop an LR, as was the hydrogen peroxide method. The use of soxhlet extractors (Stiller et al. 1988) was employed to develop an LR based on the sulfate-S concentration in the leachate. Due to time restraints this procedure was conducted after the incubation began. LR values as determined by the various methods can be found in Table 2.

Each soil was limed at five different rates with each rate replicated four times. The rates encompassed the range of LR values as determined by the laboratory tests and can be found in Table 3. Each treatment contained 0.5 kg of soil. Polyethylene containers fitted with rubber spouts were used to contain the soils. The spouts were sealed with polyethylene clamps. Glass wool was used to line the bottom of the containers. A layer of acid-washed sand was placed on top. The soil-lime mixtures were then added. The soils were moistened to approximately 33 kPa for six weeks. This was followed by two weeks in which no water was added. Alternate wetting and drying periods were chosen to simulate natural conditions. This cycle continued for fifteen months and at the end of the sixth and twelfth months each treatment was leached with 2L of distilled water. This value was chosen in order to remove many of the salts that accumulated during the incubation.
The leachate was analyzed for pH with a glass electrode pH meter. The lime used in the study was a pulverized agricultural limestone obtained from German Valley Limestone in Riverton, WV. Total Ca and Mg were determined through atomic adsorption spectrometry. Its CaC03 equivalent was determined and its particle-size distribution was defined using 20, 35, 60, 140, 200, 270, and 300 mesh sieves. The activity was derived from a chart for evaluating agricultural limestones devised by Schollenberger and Salter (1943).

The correlation coefficients among laboratory LR tests can be found in Table 4. The Woodruff, SMP-DB, and Mehlich methods were all significantly related with coefficients > .94. The three buffers were all highly correlated with the Ca(OH)2 titration and exchangeable acidity as evidenced by coefficients greater than .80. The relationship was not as strong between the Ca(OH)2 and exchangeable acidity (r=.53). The ABA-TS, ABA-RS, soxhlet extractions, and the H202 oxidation were all significantly correlated (r's > .93). These methods all account for the oxidation of residual pyrite. There was a limited relationship between the three buffers and the four sulfur methods as the coefficients ranged from .36 to .62. There was virtually no relationship between these tests and exchangeable acidity (r's < .15). The relationships between the four sulfur tests and the Ca(OH)2 were strong (r's > .75).

The CaCO3 equivalent was determined to be 96.7%. The calcitic limestone contained 42% Ca and 0.4% Mg. The sieve analysis showed that 100% passed a 60 mesh sieve, 58% a 140 mesh sieve, 35% a 200 mesh sieve, 23% a 270 mesh sieve and 3% passed a 300 mesh sieve. The activity was calculated to be .96, indicating a highly reactive limestone.
The LR values were based on the near maximum reactivity of the limestone. This was determined by plotting the leachate pH values for a particular soil against the lime application rates. The plot for soil 1, found in Figure 1, is typical of the results obtained for all soils. All soils reached a point at which increasing rates did not increase the pH significantly. The four most acidic soils reached a peak reactivity with the third liming rate while soils 5 and 6 peaked with the second and fourth rates. Near maximum reactivity pH values ranged from 7.28 to 8.05. They are referred to as near maximum reactivity values because they are below the theoretical limits on pH for pure CaCO3.
Table 5 shows the correlation coefficients and linear regression equations relating the laboratory LR values (LLR) and incubation-leaching LR values (ILR). The regression equations utilized the LLR values as the dependent variables and the ILR values as the independent variable. Regression lines can be found in Figures 2 and 3. If all lab methods were to precisely predict the LRs of the soils the intercept of the equations would be 0 and the slopes would be equal to 1. The data indicates that the intercepts vary from 0 and the slopes are not equal to 1.
The strongest relationship with the ILR was with the Ca(OH)2 (r = .95). The ABA-RS, H2O2, ABA-TS, and the soxhlet extractions were all significantly correlated with the ILR (r's = .92, .90, .89, and .84). The three buffer tests all exhibited the same strong relationship with the ILR (r = .73). The exchangeable acidity was the least correlated (r = .41). All correlations were significant at the 0.01 probability level except the exchangeable acidity.
Despite having correlation coefficients of similar magnitude the regression equations were substantially different. This may be attributed to the strong possibility of continuing acidification at different rates of the incubated samples due to pyrite oxidation. There are also differences in the nature of the acidity in the soils and in the different abilities of the LLR tests to react with these acids.
In the Ca(OH)2 test, the base reacts with both acidity in soil solution and on exchange sites. The three buffer solutions react with acidity in a similar manner. They neutralize both solution and adsorbed H ions and also contain displacing cations which remove Al compounds from exchange sites thus allowing for their neutralization with the buffer solutions.




Exchangeable H and Al are displaced by K ions in the KC1 extraction method. An amount of CaCO3 equivalent to the acidity generated from the full hydrolysis of the Al and displaced H in the extract is used as a basis for liming.
The acid-base account balances the maximum potential acidity resulting from the complete oxidation of iron sulfides against a soil's ability to neutralize this acid. Using reduced S measurements to predict the potential acidity, as opposed to total S, is more applicable to weathered minesoils since the SO4-S will no longer generate acidity. Acidic minesoils quite commonly lack basic minerals which create an intrinsic CaCO3 equivalent deficit. As a result, free acidity is often detected in determining the neutralization potential. By combining an amount of CaCO3 equivalent to the total acidity resulting from the complete oxidation of reduced S with an amount needed to neutralize the free acids, an LR is determined. In the H2O2 method an LR was based on the potential acidity from pyrite oxidation. Through the use of soxhlet extractors which simulate geochemical weathering of the minesoils alternate heating and leaching cycles maximize pyrite oxidation. An LR is formulated based on the amount of SO4-S released.
Correlation coefficients of all LR values with selected soil properties can be found in Table 6. The LR values from the three buffer methods and the Ca(OH)2 titration were significantly correlated with CEC values and levels of exchangeable Al. There was also a strong relationship between CEC and exchangeable acidity (r = .90). The Ca(OH)2 titration was also highly correlated with total and reduced-S (r .77 and .70). The four S-tests showed the strongest correlations with levels of total and reduced-S, and showed strong negative correlations with soil pH. The ILR displayed the strongest correlation with the level of total-S (r .85).

The reactivity of the limestone may not only have been controlled by the levels of acidity present, but also by the amount of SO4-S present. The precipitation of gypsum, a CaSO4 compound, with its subsequent establishment of an equilibrium with the soil solution may have slowed the dissolving of the CaCO3 due to the common ion effect.
Based on the data available from this study the Ca(OH)2 LR test was the most strongly correlated with the ILR (r = .95). The four LR tests which accounted for the maximum potential acidity from pyrite were all strongly correlated Ws > .93). There were also strong correlations among the three buffer tests and exchangeable acidity (r's > .86). The four S tests and the buffers were less well correlated. The soil property most strongly correlated with the ILR was total-S (r =.85). The SO4-S content of the soils appeared to be one of the factors controlling the solubility of the limestone. At the conclusion of the incubation, soil analysis data will be available and additional conclusions will be drawn.
Adams, F., and C. E. Evans. 1962. A rapid method for determining lime requirements of Red-Yellow Podzolic soils. Soil Sci. Sec. Am. Proc. 26:355-357.
Alabi, K. E., R. C. Sorenson, D. Knudsen, and G. W. Rehm. 1986. Comparison of several lime requirement methods of coarse-textured soils of northeastern Nebraska. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:937-941.
Allison, L. E. 1965. Organic carbon. In C. A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Agronomy 9:1376-1379. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
Caruccio, F. T. 1968. An evaluation of factors affecting acid mine drainage and the groundwater interactions in selected areas of western Pennsylvania. p. 107-151. Second Symposium on Coal Mine Drainage Research. (Pittsburgh, PA).
Crews, J. T. and W. G. Vogel. 1985. Evaluation of lime requirement tests for minesoils. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 7(2):5155.
Dunn, L. E. 1943. Lime requirement determinations of soils by means of titration curves. Soil Sci. 56:341-351.
Kamprath, E. J. 1970. Exchangeable aluminum as a criteria for liming acid leached soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34:252-254.
Keeney, D. R., and R. B. Corey. 1963. Factors affecting lime requirements of Wisconsin soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27:277-280.
Mays, D. A. and G. W. Bengston. 1978. Lime and fertilizer use in land reclamation in humid regions. In Schuler, F. W. and Sutton, Paul (Editors) Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands. Am. Soc. of Agr. p. 743.
McLean, E. 0., D. J. Eckert, G. Y. Reddy, and J. F. Trierweiller. 1978. An improved soil lime requirement method incorporating double-buffer and quick-test features. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42:311-316.
Mehlich, A. 1976. New buffer pH method for rapid estimation of exchangeable acidity and lime requirement of soils. Comm. in Soil Sci. and Plant Anal. 7:637652.
Savant, N. K., and M. M. Kibe. 1971. Acidity in Lateritic rice soils as estimated by various methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35:845-846.
Schollenbrger, C. J. and R. M. Salter. 1943. A chart for evaluating agricultural limestone. Am. Soc. Agr. Proc. 35:955-966.
Shoemaker, H. E., E. 0. McLean, and P. F. Pratt. 1961. Buffer methods for determination of lime requirements of soils with appreciable amounts of exchangeable aluminum. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 25:274-277.
Smith, E. E., and L. S. Shumate. 1970. Sulfide to sulfate reaction mechanism. Water Pollution Control Series. 14010 FRS os/70, E.P.A. Superintendent of Documents. 115 p. Wash. D.C.
Smith, R. M., W. E. Grube, Jr., T. Arkle, Jr., A. Sobek. 1974. Mine spoil potentials for soil and water quality. EPA-670/2-74-070. USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sobek, A. A., W. A. Schuller, J. R. Freeman and R. M. Smith. 1978. Field and Laboratory Methods APplicable to overburdens and Minesoils. EPA-600/2-78-054. U.S.E.P.A., Cincinnati, Ohio.
Soil Survey Staff. 1984. Procedures for collecting soil samples and methods of analysis for soil survey. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1, USDA Soil Conservation Service, Wash., D.C.
Stiller, A. H., J. J. Renton, and T. E. Rymer. 1988. A laboratory procedure to evaluate the acid producing potential of coal associated rocks. Mining Science and Technology. 7:227-235.
Trans, T. S. and W. van Lierop. 1982. Lime requirement determination for attaining pH of 5.5 and 6.0 of coarse-textured soils using buffer-pH methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46:1008-1014.
Woodruff, C. M. 1948. Testing soils for lime requirement by means of a buffered solution and the glass electrode. Soil Sci. 66:53-66.
Yuan, T. L. 1974. A double buffer method for the determination of lime requirement of acid soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38:437441.